This section reacts into the concern ” exactly What maybe you have discovered?” Ergo, just representative outcomes from pursuit must certanly be presented. The outcomes must be needed for conversation.
Statistical guidelines
- Indicate the statistical tests used in combination with all appropriate parameters: e.g., mean and deviation that is standardSD): 44% (±3); median and interpercentile range: 7 years (4.5 to 9.5 years).
- Use mean and standard deviation to report ordinarily distributed information.
- Utilize median and interpercentile range to report skewed information.
- For figures, use two significant digits unless more accuracy is important (2.08, maybe not 2.07856444).
- Never ever make use of percentages for extremely samples that are small, “one away from two” shouldn’t be changed by 50%.
But, keep in mind that many journals provide the chance of incorporating materials that are supporting therefore make use of them easily for information of additional value. In this manner, usually do not try to “hide” information into the hope of saving it for a paper that is later. You may lose proof to bolster your summary. If information are way too numerous, you should use those additional materials.
Utilize sub-headings to help keep outcomes of the type that is same, which will be much easier to review and read. Quantity these sub-sections when it comes to ease of internal cross-referencing, but constantly considering the publisher’s Guide for Authors.
For the data, choose an order that is logical tells an obvious tale and causes it to be and simple to know. Generally speaking, this will be when you look at the exact same purchase as presented into the practices area.
An essential issue is you are presenting your results, so you cannot refer to others here that you must not include references in this section. In the event that you make reference to other people, is mainly because you might be talking about your outcomes, and also this needs to be within the Discussion area.divider|Because you will be speaking about your outcomes, and also this should be contained in the Discussion area.divider if you make reference to other people, is
Write the Discussion
Right right right Here you need to react to exactly just what the outcomes suggest. Most likely it’s the easiest area to create, however the most difficult area to have appropriate. This is because it’s the many essential area of your article. right Here you can get the chance to market important computer data. Remember that a massive variety of manuscripts are refused since the Discussion is poor.
You ought to make the Discussion corresponding to your total results, but don’t reiterate the outcomes. right Here you ought to compare the posted results by the peers with yours (using a number of the sources within the Introduction). Never ever ignore work with disagreement that you are correct or better with yours, in turn, you must confront it and convince the reader.
Consider the following tips:
1. Avoid statements that go beyond exactly just what the total outcomes can help.
2. Avoid unspecific expressions such as “higher temperature”, “at a reduced rate”, “highly significant”. Quantitative information are often preferred (35єC, 0.5%, p Minimize personal communications, don’t consist of unpublished findings, manuscripts submitted although not yet accepted for publication, magazines that aren’t peer evaluated, grey literature, or articles perhaps maybe maybe not posted in English.
When I have actually mentioned, you will discover probably the most respected information for every single journal’s policy on citations whenever you consult the log’s Guide for Authors. Generally speaking, you ought to reduce individual communications, and become mindful on how you consist of unpublished findings. These are going to be required for some procedures, but think about if they strengthen or weaken your paper. You may additionally start thinking about articles posted on research systems just before book, but think about balancing these citations with citations of peer-reviewed research. Whenever research that is citing languages apart from English, be familiar with the chance that not everybody into the review procedure will speak the language regarding the cited paper and that it may possibly be useful to look for an interpretation where feasible.
Any software can be used by you, such as for example EndNote or Mendeley, to format you need to include your sources into the paper. Many journals have the chance to download little files with the structure for the sources, enabling you to change it out immediately. Additionally, Elsevier’s Your Paper your path program waves formatting that is strict for the original distribution of the manuscript so long as it includes most of the important elements being presented right right here.
Result in the reference list and also the in-text citation conform strictly to your style offered when you look at the Guide for Authors. Keep in mind that presentation of this recommendations into the format that is correct the duty associated with writer, perhaps perhaps not the editor. Checking the structure is generally a big work for the editors. Make their work easier plus they shall appreciate your time and effort.
Finally, always check the immediate following:
- Spelling of writer names
- Of publications year
- Usages of “et al.”
- Punctuation
- Whether all sources are included
Within my next article, i am going to provide methods for composing the manuscript, authorship, and exactly how to create a compelling resume cover letter. Stay tuned!divider
References and Acknowledgements
We have based this paper from the materials distributed to your attendees of many courses. It really is prompted by numerous Guides for writers of Elsevier journals. A number of this info is research topics in psychology for college students additionally featured in Elsevier’s Publishing Connect tutorials. In addition, We have consulted a few website pages: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/, www.physics.ohio-state.edu/
I wish to acknowledge Dr. Christiane Barranguet, Executive Publisher of Aquatic Sciences at Elsevier, on her constant support. And I also wish to thank Dr. Alison Bert, Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier Connect; without her support, this series could have been impractical to finish.
Related Tales
In this brand new series — “How to get ready a Manuscript for Overseas Journals” — a practiced editor provides advice to improve your likelihood of acceptance
Students writes in regards to the inspiration behind their model for earthquake forecast – and exactly just what he discovered on their (“tedious but well well worth it”) journey to book
Whatever they don’t always inform you before you subscribe for graduate college
The perfect research system you envision just isn’t just exactly what it looks
Journal editors expose the utmost effective reasons a manuscript gets posted
Tips for Authors through the Publishing Connect Training Webcasts Channel
A log editor reveals the most notable reasons many manuscripts don’t ensure it is into the review process that is peer